Craft Do website UX review
A scan-backed analysis of how Craft Do performs across usability, visual clarity, and UX best practices. Use it as a reference for what to borrow, what to question, and what to test on your own site.
Sensei score: 85 out of 100
Aesthetic
80Practices
76How Craft Do looks
The verdict
Visual execution leads for Craft Do
Craft Do receives a Sensei score of 85/100. Visual execution leads at 80/100, while functional clarity sits at 75/100. That spread gives this landing review a concrete shape: the stronger layer establishes the page's baseline, and the lower layer identifies where another pass could be most useful.
Observed UX signals
- Majorfunctional
Trust & Credibility
User testimonials lack attribution depth. The page shows names, roles, and use cases (e.g., 'Tom, Podcaster and newsletter writer'), but does not provide verifiable identity signals such as profile links, company affiliations, or social proof indicators. For a productivity app competing in a crowded market, this reduces the credibility weight of the testimonials.
- Minorfunctional
Focus & Hierarchy
The page contains multiple 'Learn more' links across different feature sections (Write, Imagine, Plan, Customize). While each routes to a distinct product area, the identical CTA text creates visual repetition that may reduce scannability and make it harder for users to distinguish between feature modules at a glance.
- Minorfunctional
Accessibility
Several decorative images have null or generic alt text ('null', 'Paper texture', 'Cloud'). While the page reports 0 missing alt text, some images appear to be purely decorative (paper textures, clouds), and their alt text does not meaningfully describe content or purpose for screen reader users.
More UX reviews
Browse all →How does your site score?
Get the same layer-by-layer UX review for your homepage, pricing page, or product page.