Base website UX review
A scan-backed analysis of how Base performs across usability, visual clarity, and UX best practices. Use it as a reference for what to borrow, what to question, and what to test on your own site.
Aesthetic
78Practices
81How Base looks

The verdict
Best-practices coverage leads for Base
Base receives a Sensei score of 89/100. Best-practices coverage leads at 81/100, while visual execution sits at 78/100. That spread gives this landing review a concrete shape: the stronger layer establishes the page's baseline, and the lower layer identifies where another pass could be most useful.
Observed UX signals
- Majorfunctional
Clarity
Page data shows 'No headings found' in the extracted structure, indicating the visual hierarchy relies entirely on visual styling rather than semantic HTML heading tags. The hero message 'The blockchain for global finance' and supporting copy 'Built by Coinbase, trusted by leading institutions, and open to all' are present visually but not marked as H1/H2 in the DOM, which undermines both assistive technology navigation and SEO signal strength.
- Majorfunctional
TrustCredibility
The claim 'Trusted by 1,000+ businesses' appears in the page content but lacks supporting evidence, attribution, or context. No link to case studies, customer list, or verification is provided. For a blockchain platform positioning itself as enterprise-grade, this unsubstantiated social proof claim weakens credibility.
- Majorfunctional
ConversionOptimization
Two primary CTAs compete at similar visual weight in the hero: 'Build on Base' (button) and 'Get Base App' (button). The page data does not clarify which is primary or what each action leads to. 'Build on Base' links to external docs (docs.base.org), while 'Get Base App' destination is unclear. Users cannot quickly determine which path matches their intent (developer vs. trader vs. user).
More UX reviews
Browse all →How does your site score?
Get the same layer-by-layer UX review for your homepage, pricing page, or product page.